<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turn Off Your Comments or Get Out Your Checkbooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dcrblogs.com/2010/12/01/turn-off-your-comments-or-get-out-your-checkbooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dcrblogs.com/2010/12/01/turn-off-your-comments-or-get-out-your-checkbooks/</link>
	<description>Motivating readers to believe, act, and achieve by looking at life with wit, wisdom, and engaging creativity</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dcr</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrblogs.com/2010/12/01/turn-off-your-comments-or-get-out-your-checkbooks/#comment-31283</link>
		<dc:creator>dcr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrblogs.com/?p=3486#comment-31283</guid>
		<description>By putting up a website or blog, you become a publisher and you become liable for the content published on your site, which includes user-generated content.

Now, typically, a copyright holder will contact you and have it removed, without going through the trouble of a lawsuit.  Lawsuits cost money and most people will avoid it if they can.

In Righthaven's case, however, the newspaper sold their copyrights to this firm that then turns around and sues anyone who has their content appearing on their site.  According to the Wired article, they appear to be targeting those who don't have a registered agent.  So, who knows how long it will be before others follow suit?

And that's the crux of the matter.  The DMCA gives you a safe harbor against being sued for stuff like this, however, it appears that recent court rulings have determined that you must have a registered agent in order to meet the qualifications of the safe harbor provisions.

Thus, it is important to spend the $105+ to register.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By putting up a website or blog, you become a publisher and you become liable for the content published on your site, which includes user-generated content.</p>
<p>Now, typically, a copyright holder will contact you and have it removed, without going through the trouble of a lawsuit.  Lawsuits cost money and most people will avoid it if they can.</p>
<p>In Righthaven&#8217;s case, however, the newspaper sold their copyrights to this firm that then turns around and sues anyone who has their content appearing on their site.  According to the Wired article, they appear to be targeting those who don&#8217;t have a registered agent.  So, who knows how long it will be before others follow suit?</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the crux of the matter.  The DMCA gives you a safe harbor against being sued for stuff like this, however, it appears that recent court rulings have determined that you must have a registered agent in order to meet the qualifications of the safe harbor provisions.</p>
<p>Thus, it is important to spend the $105+ to register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meleah rebeccah</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrblogs.com/2010/12/01/turn-off-your-comments-or-get-out-your-checkbooks/#comment-31282</link>
		<dc:creator>meleah rebeccah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrblogs.com/?p=3486#comment-31282</guid>
		<description>what the what? How can YOU be held liable for OTHER people's actions? I do NOT understand THAT at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the what? How can YOU be held liable for OTHER people&#8217;s actions? I do NOT understand THAT at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

