<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Curation - The Latest IM Scheme to Separate You from Your Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dcrblogs.com/2011/02/24/content-curation-the-latest-im-scheme-to-separate-you-from-your-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dcrblogs.com/2011/02/24/content-curation-the-latest-im-scheme-to-separate-you-from-your-money/</link>
	<description>Motivating readers to believe, act, and achieve by looking at life with wit, wisdom, and engaging creativity</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Dininni</title>
		<link>http://www.dcrblogs.com/2011/02/24/content-curation-the-latest-im-scheme-to-separate-you-from-your-money/#comment-31597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Dininni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcrblogs.com/?p=3672#comment-31597</guid>
		<description>Great warning, Dan! Just goes to show that many are willing to venture into questionable ethical areas to make a quick buck. (After all, if they give it a new name, maybe no one will realize they've seen it before -- or by the time they notice that it's strangely familiar, they'll have already spent their hard-earned cash to find out what they already knew.)

I agree with you: While "they (may) need to re-package old concepts in a shiny new box," we certainly don't need to &lt;i&gt;buy&lt;/i&gt; them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great warning, Dan! Just goes to show that many are willing to venture into questionable ethical areas to make a quick buck. (After all, if they give it a new name, maybe no one will realize they&#8217;ve seen it before &#8212; or by the time they notice that it&#8217;s strangely familiar, they&#8217;ll have already spent their hard-earned cash to find out what they already knew.)</p>
<p>I agree with you: While &#8220;they (may) need to re-package old concepts in a shiny new box,&#8221; we certainly don&#8217;t need to <i>buy</i> them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

