Have you checked out I Do Things today?

Archive for the ‘Thoughts’ Category

Just a Little Bit More

Saturday, January 1st, 2011

Remember when you were a kid, and your mom told you it was time to come in from outside playing or time to go to bed, and you would say:

“Just five more minutes!”

We always wanted just a little bit more.

That’s something that continues on into adulthood.

You get a job, you get a decent pay but, after a while, you want just a little bit more.

It’s something that can ruin you when gambling. You might win a bunch of money, but then you get to thinking you’d like just a little bit more.

It’s always just a little bit more that we want.

Somehow, however, people can’t seem to fathom that politicians are just the same.

They see nothing but altruistic motives behind “their” guy (or gal).

But, they’re no different.

They see the power they have and, maybe at first, they’ll use it wisely. But then, after a while, they want just a little bit more.

And, if they have to power to do this, why can’t they do just a little bit more?

And, the thing is, people don’t pay attention. They only see things that are taken away from them a big lot at a time.

You might have a nice hill in your yard. A nice little mound where you put your favorite flowers every year. And then, one year, you notice that the mound just isn’t as high as it used to be. You’d go out there, year after year, planting your flowers. You’d enjoy it year after year. Each year, erosion from rainfall and digging critters and from the soil stuck to your knees and gardening tools eats away at your mound.

But, you don’t notice.

You only notice when the mound appears much smaller than it was before.

And so it is with everything. The politicians take power a little at a time. Often, it’s a game to them. Fail today? Try again tomorrow. Hard to stem the tide. If you argue that your rights are being taken away a little at a time, you’re laughed off as silly or extremist. People are looking at the mound and seeing a big mound still. They don’t see the bits and pieces going away.

You can move a mountain, one rock at a time. It may take a very long time, but it will eventually get moved. Eventually, you get tired of chasing away the rock carriers. The mountain will be there for you. What’s a few rocks? Let your grandkids worry about that, right? You don’t have time to keep chasing away the rock carriers all the time, right?

And, that’s what they count on. If you have patience, you can seize power without a fight. You can do so by moving one little rock at a time. Who’ll notice a rock gone from the mountainside?

Until, one day, you look up and the mountain just isn’t as big as it used to be.

Of course, you don’t need to start a fight either. Just grab a friend and put back two rocks for every rock that is taken. With patience, you’ll keep that mountain and maybe even make it a little bigger.

Freedom Works

Friday, December 31st, 2010

As 2010 draws to a close, the 2001-2010 decade comes to an end as well.

And, it seems to me that, over the past decade, we’ve been going backwards a lot. Too much, I fear.

Things started out so well. We were all so worried about the year 2000, from Y2K to miscellaneous fears that the end of the world was near and so on. But, January 1, 2000 came and went and we were all still here.

And things seemed to be on such a high note. We made it. And it seemed the future was well within our grasp.

Then, of course, came September 11, 2001. Since then, it seems the terrorists have been winning. Certainly, in terms of mass casualties, they’ve had limited success since 2001. But, in terms of affecting our country and the world around us, they’ve been winning.

In the name of “safety” and “security,” politicians have been curtailing our freedoms left and right. And many of these measures provide little more than an illusion of safety. There are new reporting requirements on your bank transactions, for example. And, now, to board an airplane, you have to be exposed to a virtual strip search or be molested by ill-trained, uncaring government employees.

And, when people expose the flaws in the so-called security measures, they are punished, sidelined and silenced.

There are new laws restricting people, for example, from recording encounters with police. There was one politician who just about assaulted someone trying to ask him a question. (If I remember right, that clown was not re-elected, fortunately.)

Additionally worrisome is how people go along with things. When a former Baywatch actress was selected for a full body scan, there were comments on forums that she should have been fine with it, since she once posed for Playboy.

I suppose it makes sense, right? After all, we all know the terrorists were a group of disgruntled, blonde swimsuit models bent on world domination. Oh, wait, they weren’t…

Heaven forbid we should use some common sense. But, common sense isn’t politically correct.

Of course, picking out hot women in a crowd and targeting them for their choice of a full body scan or getting felt up so a bunch of government workers can get their jollies for the day isn’t really protecting anyone. Yet, people will defend the nonsense because they can enjoy the illusion that these things are actually protecting us.

Then we have stuff like the CPSIA, which was a knee-jerk reaction by dimwitted politicians to lead-tainted toys that came from China. But the burden of the new regulations was on American small businesses that weren’t responsible for the mess, placing new financial burdens on them while providing the bigger manufacturers—the ones that had been responsible for the lead-tainted goods—more leeway in reducing their costs of compliance. Small businesses, for example, had to use expensive third-party testing whereas the big manufacturers could have their own in-house testing labs. Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!

And, now, with the healthcare law that passed last year—without the morons who passed it even reading the stuff, proclaiming proudly that it needed to be passed before we could learn what was in it—there are additional requirements on small businesses in 1099 reporting requirements, which is going to be a huge mess and result in increased costs for small businesses when they can least afford it.

And guess who those costs will be passed along to? Yeah, the consumer. So, the politicians are going to put increased financial burdens on companies already struggling, in a time of high unemployment, which will raise the costs of things for those with and without jobs. Smart move—not!

Yet, people think that politicians are really good at heart, that they really mean well and want to help us.

Well, consider this… For traffic lights, studies have shown that having the lights stay yellow longer reduces accidents. It gives drivers more time to clear the intersections or to come to a stop.

In spite of this, politicians across the country have been reducing yellow light times.

Why? Well, so they can catch more drivers running red lights. And that means more traffic tickets and fees, which means more money in the government coffers for the politicians to spend.

Nevermind that it comes at a cost of public safety. They can stand up on their cardboard podiums all they want and proclaim their actions are for the public good, but they aren’t. If it was all about safety, they would increase yellow light durations, not decrease them. But, they don’t really care about safety. They care about more money in the government coffers, so that they can bribe us with our own money to get re-elected.

They only care about maintaining an illusion of safety. And, if something happens that pokes a hole in that illusion, they’ll find some patsy to blame instead of admitting that government policies—their policies—were to blame.

Why should you expect politicians to be any different at the federal level? You shouldn’t.

Don’t forget about the whole global warming sham either. Yes, sham. For years, politicians and government-funded scientists have been warning about our impending demise at the hands of warmer temperatures. They’ve blamed the carbon dioxide we release into the air. They even want to label carbon dioxide—which we produce each time we exhale—as a “pollutant.”

They’ve told us it leads to a greenhouse effect, where the earth’s entire atmosphere will heat up and continue to get warmer and warmer.

The situation was dire. Their agendas didn’t immediately get passed into law. Their dire predictions that, if we didn’t change things immediately, there would be no hope for us, did not come to pass. Warming slowed. Cooling began to happen—in sharp contrast with their predictions of spiked increases in temperatures. Some even made the ridiculous claim that global warming could cause global cooling.

Yeah, politicians aren’t exactly the sharpest crayons in the box.

Then, realizing Mother Nature had called their bluff, they began to change tactics. Instead of “global warming,” they now referred to their imagined crisis as “climate change.” That way, whatever the weather does, they can say it’s all out fault.

And, still, they want to regulate carbon dioxide. They want companies—and eventually us all—to measure our “carbon footprints.” This all in spite of the fact that the greenhouse effect did not happen, that the warming apparently caused by our “carbon footprints” did not continue its projected upward spike. No, their lies have been laid waste; they just keep covering it up with more and more excuses.

Not to mention the last couple years of Congress ramming legislation through against the wishes of the people they are supposed to represent. Legislation that was hastily written, often by invested groups with their own agendas and not by the people that are actually supposed to represent us, and legislation that was largely unread by the people that voted on and passed it!

And that’s the road we’re heading down. Less freedom. Some people think we’re simply trading a little freedom for a more safety, but what we are really doing is giving up a lot more freedom than we realize in exchange for what is largely an illusion of increased safety.

Deep down, I believe, and continue to believe, that freedom works. We are where we are today not because of a bunch of politicians sitting around micro-managing our lives but because we have long enjoyed the freedom to manage our own lives.

We don’t need bureaucrats telling us where we can and cannot go and determining how we can and cannot get there. We don’t need them telling us what to read or watch or listen to. We don’t need them telling us what we can or cannot eat. And so on.

It used to be that I worried about politicians sticking their noses in our bedrooms and their hands in our wallets. But, nowadays, it’s more like they’ve got their hands down our pockets, their fingers in our wallets and they want to take a picture on themselves doing it and put it on the Internet.

I think we are on the verge of great things. New technologies, cures for diseases, more discoveries and so on. But, we need the freedom to find them. We don’t need Nanny Government watching over our shoulder, recording and judging our every move. We don’t need the artificial obstacles standing in our way. We need to be free.

Freedom works. Look how far we have come in the past 200 years. Do you think anyone in 1810 could even imagine being able to talk face-to-face with someone on the other side of the world on a metal and glass device they could hold in their hand? Do you think they could imagine sending a message and having it reach its destination across town, across the country or across the ocean in a matter of seconds? Do you think they could have imagined holding an entire library of books in the palm of their hand?

Just imagine where we could be 200 years from now. But, that depends on a future where we are free and not one in which we are herded about here and there as though we were cattle. When was the last time you saw a cow create something that changed the world?

Tell the politicians to take their fear-mongering and their deceptive claims of “security” and their false cries of “it’s for the children” and tell them to stuff it. People yearn to be free. People deserve to be free. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are inalienable rights. Inalienable. These are not rights that the government or the politicians said we could have. They are our inherent rights. Our government exists to preserve and protect our rights, not to take them away from us.

Freedom works.

Too many politicians these days seem to think they are elected to rule over us, not to serve us. They think that they should determine what freedoms we can keep. They think that they should decide how we can live, what liberties we may exercise and what happiness we may pursue. But, those are not things for them to decide. Those our reserved for us.

You have inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

When the politicians forget this, remind them. When they ignore this, remind them. When they stomp on this, remind them. Write them. Call them. Speak truth to power. Call them out. If they are on Twitter, remind them there. If they are on Facebook, remind them there. Blog about it. Make videos. Let them know who they work for. Let them know who they serve.

And, if they continue to act as petty dictators, if they continue to want to control your life and restrict your freedoms, boot them out of office.

Freedom works. Freedom benefits us all. Freedom moves us forward. Let us be free.

How Could It All Just Disappear?

Sunday, December 12th, 2010

That’s often an argument—or at least something in the back of people’s minds—when the topic of lost civilizations or lost knowledge are brought up.

It’s unfathomable for some that an advanced civilization could be wiped out without a trace, except through stories passed on by word of mouth, which are eventually believed to be myths rather than true tales.

But, when disaster strikes, how many people say “Grab as many books as you can and run for your lives!” versus how many say “Grab the kids and go!”

We typically value life above all else and when disaster strikes, the survival instinct kicks in, so the thought of preserving life takes an even higher precedence than it might at any other time.

The thought is to save lives and rebuild later.

Of course, it can be hard to rebuild without all the knowledge and tools, which were probably left behind or, in some cases, just not possible to move.

Think about it. Can you rebuild your desktop computer from scratch, if there were no place to buy parts?

And that’s what happens in a major disaster, especially if you were more advanced than neighboring civilizations and didn’t share everything with them. Or, if the disaster is a worldwide phenomena. Then, everybody loses stuff. Experts are killed. Knowledge is lost. Tools are destroyed and lost. People that could fix things no longer have the parts and tools to do so. They may become scarce. People may fight over them, and then they get lost or destroyed again.

As resources become scarce, people think of their immediate survival and not of the future. So, things get worse before they get better. And knowledge gets lost over time as people with the knowledge are killed or otherwise die.

So, it may be unthinkable but, yes, it can all just disappear.

Is There Anything that People Won’t Complain About? Redux

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

You may remember this post from April 7th of this year: “Is There Anything that People Won’t Complain About?

Since that is exactly how I am feeling right now, I am going to repeat it.

You know, for effect.

And because I was going to write something else, but the more I thought about it, the more I felt like this older post and why rehash it when I can just copy and paste it? Like this…

Seriously. Anything? Especially online?

I’ve seen comments lately (and long before lately too) from people that complain about things that really don’t have the slightest bit of anything to do with them. I’m not talking about any place specifically; I’m talking about a number of sites I visit online.

It’s like if I painted a room in my house green. It’s one thing to say that you prefer blue or that you would have painted it white with green accents. There’s no real issue if you want to express your opinion.

It’s if you want to complain, and bitterly complain, that I painted a room green because you think I should have painted it ochre. Or to complain that I painted the room at all because I should get new carpeting. Or whatever.

Especially if you’ve never been to my house, you haven’t loaned me money for the paint or paint brush and you’ve really had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with my house, my room or my painting of the room green.

It’s like there are people that live to complain about things.

The real problem is that this sort of attitude permeates our society. And the complainers are often the loudest voices while they are also often the most irrational. And then, if you complain about the complainers, you’re labeled no better than them.

Except the difference is that while their gripe was illegitimate because what you did had nothing to do with them, your gripe is perfectly legitimate because their complaining may be hurting you. But, now you’re the bad guy.

And that’s because the chronic complainers get the attention. They’ll write letters. They’ll annoy people. Then there will be people that will step up and lend legitimacy to the complainers by arguing that, though some of them may be extreme, it’s perfectly reasonable to argue that painting a room in ochre is a better choice than green because it brightens the place up better.

And that makes people happier, which makes them more productive, which makes things better for society.

And, studies released by the paint companies that sell ochre paint confirm those findings.

And then the politicians decide that no one should paint their rooms green and that they should be painted ochre.

And then soon all of us are painting our rooms ochre because of a few complainers that had nothing better to do than to complain about something that didn’t affect them at all to begin with.

Well, that was an easy post. And I feel better now. Sort of. Had too much to eat for supper, so I’m still feeling kind of stuffed. Went to Five Guys Burgers and Fries. Got a “regular” order of cajun fries. Which looked like a small order of fries. Which turned out to be a rather large looking cup of fries which was overfilled, and overflowing into a larger brown bag. So, there was a lot of fries. A lot of fries. And, you know, I can’t waste food. I had to eat the fries. I had to bring the brown bag home and finish the fries. There were a lot of fries. Did I mention the fries?

Yes, I did have fries with that.

Am I complaining? Um, no. Just saying it was a lot of fries.

A lot of fries.

It bears repeating.

A lot of fries.

Until next time,
Believe. Act. Eat Fries!

Movies as Seen by Percentage of Population

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Yesterday, on Big Hollywood, I read “Flyover State of Mind: Hollywood’s Red State Prejudice” by Carl Kozlowski.

In it, he mentioned that Avatar was the highest-grossing movie of all time but that, based on his estimates, only about 20% of the population had even seen it. (I came up with 31.34%, as you’ll see in the below table, but I used a different method of estimation.)

I decided it might be interesting to see the statistics on movie ticket sales as compared to the percentage of the population that had seen the movie.

Through Box Office Mojo, I got a list of the top 100 movies by ticket sales. (I only used the top 25 here.) And, through the U.S. Census, I was able to get population estimates for the years 1900-1999. I found the 2009 estimate through U.S. News & World Report.

Of course, these estimates are not going to scientifically accurate, and are presented more as a curiosity than an accurate accounting. For one thing, there is no way to filter out repeat ticket sales to the same people. So, one person may see a movie once while another may go back to see the film ten times. As such, the ticket sales will be higher than the number of individuals who have seen the film. On the flip side, this chart also does not account for VHS/DVD sales. These days, some may wait until the film is released on video so they can view at home. On the other hand, some will view it in the theatre and then buy the video to enjoy at home. So, again, there’s no way to determine that based on the available data. On a related note, the films before the advent of home video may have an advantage in ticket sales simply because, back then, the only way to see the movie was at the theatre.

The bottom line is that we cannot get a truly accurate measure of how many individuals have actually seen a given film.

That said, however, it can still paint an interesting picture and provide an alternative perspective to conventional means of estimating a movie’s popularity.

Some things of note. First, you’ll see that Gone with the Wind had more ticket sales than the U.S. population. According to the stats, 154% of the country saw the film. Of course, we know that’s not possible and must necessarily include multiple ticket sales by individuals. Still, this is a striking number, considering this was at the tail-end of the Great Depression.

By contrast, the #2 film on the list, Star Wars, had just 12% fewer ticket sales than Gone with the Wind, but those ticket sales represented under 81% of the population.

Similarly, The Empire Strikes Back was almost equal in ticket sales to Ben Hur, but was seen by 12% less of the population. And, while Avatar had more ticket sales, it was viewed by half the amount of the population of Fantasia.

On the other hand, if you rank the movies by percentage of the population, 8 of the top 10 films remain in the top 10. Only The Exorcist and Titanic leave the ranks of the top ten, dropping into the teens. Fantasia moves into the #7 spot and Ben Hur just makes the cut at #10. It’d be interesting to see how ranks changed if all 100 top films were thrown into the calculations.

Anyway, for your consideration, debate and enjoyment, here is the table:

Rank Title Year Estimated Tickets Sold Estimated US Population % of Population
1 Gone with the Wind 1939 202,044,600 130,879,718 154.37
2 Star Wars 1977 178,119,600 220,239,425 80.88
3 The Sound of Music 1965 142,415,400 194,302,963 73.30
4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial 1982 141,854,300 231,664,458 61.23
5 The Ten Commandments 1956 131,000,000 168,903,031 77.56
6 Titanic 1997 128,345,900 267,783,607 47.93
7 Jaws 1975 128,078,800 215,973,199 59.30
8 Doctor Zhivago 1965 124,135,500 194,302,963 63.89
9 The Exorcist 1973 110,568,700 211,908,788 52.18
10 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs 1937 109,000,000 128,824,829 84.61
11 101 Dalmatians 1961 99,917,300 183,691,481 54.39
12 The Empire Strikes Back 1980 98,180,600 227,224,681 43.21
13 Ben-Hur 1959 98,000,000 177,829,628 55.11
14 Avatar 2009 95,742,700 305,529,237 31.34
15 Return of the Jedi 1983 94,059,400 233,791,994 40.23
16 The Sting 1973 89,142,900 211,908,788 42.07
17 Raiders of the Lost Ark 1981 88,141,900 229,465,714 38.41
18 Jurassic Park 1993 86,205,800 257,782,608 33.44
19 The Graduate 1967 85,571,400 198,712,056 43.06
20 Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace 1999 84,825,800 272,690,813 31.11
21 Fantasia 1941 83,043,500 133,402,471 62.25
22 The Godfather 1972 78,922,600 209,896,021 37.60
23 Forrest Gump 1994 78,545,600 260,327,021 30.17
24 Mary Poppins 1964 78,181,800 191,888,791 40.74
25 The Lion King 1994 77,231,800 260,327,021 29.67

Sources:
Movies & Ticket Sale Estimates: http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm?adjust_yr=1&p=.htm
U.S. Population Estimates: http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/popclockest.txt
U.S. Population Estimate (2009): http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2008/12/31/us-population-2009-305-million-and-counting

Ruminations on a Friday Early Afternoon

Friday, April 30th, 2010

Given the current wave of “political correctness” in describing things not as they are but as suits a particular agenda, should we begin a massive relabeling of people based on their behavioral choices?

Such as…

Should bank robbers, muggers and other money thieves be called “undeserved earners”?

If people commit adultery, maybe instead of calling them an adulterers, we should call them “extramarital activists.”

Murders can be relabeled as “population reductionists.”

Flashers and streakers can be called “anatomic exhibitors.”

Drug dealers could be called “recreational intoxicant distributors.”

And, while we’re at it, we should just call newspaper writers “propagandists” because that’s pretty much what they’ve reduced themselves to these days.

Is There Anything that People Won’t Complain About?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Seriously. Anything? Especially online?

I’ve seen comments lately (and long before lately too) from people that complain about things that really don’t have the slightest bit of anything to do with them. I’m not talking about any place specifically; I’m talking about a number of sites I visit online.

It’s like if I painted a room in my house green. It’s one thing to say that you prefer blue or that you would have painted it white with green accents. There’s no real issue if you want to express your opinion.

It’s if you want to complain, and bitterly complain, that I painted a room green because you think I should have painted it ochre. Or to complain that I painted the room at all because I should get new carpeting. Or whatever.

Especially if you’ve never been to my house, you haven’t loaned me money for the paint or paint brush and you’ve really had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with my house, my room or my painting of the room green.

It’s like there are people that live to complain about things.

The real problem is that this sort of attitude permeates our society. And the complainers are often the loudest voices while they are also often the most irrational. And then, if you complain about the complainers, you’re labeled no better than them.

Except the difference is that while their gripe was illegitimate because what you did had nothing to do with them, your gripe is perfectly legitimate because their complaining may be hurting you. But, now you’re the bad guy.

And that’s because the chronic complainers get the attention. They’ll write letters. They’ll annoy people. Then there will be people that will step up and lend legitimacy to the complainers by arguing that, though some of them may be extreme, it’s perfectly reasonable to argue that painting a room in ochre is a better choice than green because it brightens the place up better.

And that makes people happier, which makes them more productive, which makes things better for society.

And, studies released by the paint companies that sell ochre paint confirm those findings.

And then the politicians decide that no one should paint their rooms green and that they should be painted ochre.

And then soon all of us are painting our rooms ochre because of a few complainers that had nothing better to do than to complain about something that didn’t affect them at all to begin with.

Why Doesn’t The Tonight Show End at 11:59?

Friday, January 29th, 2010

You know, for weeks now, people (mostly Conan supporters) have claimed that moving The Tonight Show to 12:05 a.m. would have made it The Tomorrow Show.

In that case, why is the second half of The Tonight Show still considered The Tonight Show? After midnight, it’s no longer “tonight”, right?

Night doesn’t end at 11:59 p.m. Night spans from sunset to sunrise. So, 12:05 is still night, right? If you’re out late, do you refer to midnight as morning? It’s still night.

Let’s look at it another way. When is Saturday night? Saturday after sunset, right? Saturday Night Live is on at 11:30 p.m., right? It’s not on at 3:00 a.m. on Saturday, is it? When it turns to 12:00 a.m. and becomes Sunday, do you think of that as Sunday morning? Or, do you still think of it as Saturday night?

Do you think of 12:00 a.m. Saturday to sunrise as Saturday night? And then sunset to 11:59 p.m. on Saturday as the second Saturday night? The other Saturday night? The second-half of Saturday night? Or, do you still think of 12:00 a.m. as part of Friday night? It’s still night, right? And, if it’s not Saturday night, it’s Friday night. Even if you don’t think of it as Friday night, it’s still the same night, right? The sun didn’t pop up at 12:00:00 a.m. and dip back down at 12:00:59 a.m., right? So, it’s all the same night. Even though it may be a different day, it’s still the same night. It’s still tonight.

Otherwise, The Tonight Show would have to be a half-hour show.

Fun with Numbers

Monday, December 28th, 2009

The average income in the U.S. is $25,000 per year. Assuming a 40-hour work week, that works out to be $12.02 per hour.

The average lifespan in the U.S. is 78 years. Assuming you start work at 18 and retire at 65, that’s 47 working years. That’s 97,760 working hours using a 40-hour work week.

In 2009, the federal government in the U.S. is estimated to have spent somewhere around $3 trillion (varies, depending on source, but $3 trillion is about the “average” figure I’ve come across). That would be $3,000,000,000,000.

It would take 24,958,403,000 hours to pay that off.

It would take 255,303 people working their entire lives to pay that off.

And that’s just this year’s spending.

To pay it off in one year’s time, it would take 11,999,232 average people giving 100% of their income.

In other words, if you figure money spent in terms of hours worked, federal spending in 2009 is the equivalent of nearly 12 million people working all year and not keeping any of their money.

Merry Holiday Celebrations

Thursday, December 24th, 2009

Harry Reid Borg

Pretty much sums up where things are headed…